Skip to main content

hobson's choice


I've been reading through the posts and I get the feeling that many people feel that they have no control over their actions; they are driven. What if you and they knew that it is up to the individual to determine their own response to e-mails, to stress, to unrealistic demands - to whatever they encounter? You and they have a choice. What makes people so readily give up the power over their own lives? 


Deep. You are right - most people have a choice. They can choose to leave at any time to pursue other opportunities. But they stay since they know they have to put a few years in in order to get a better opportunity elsewhere.  And so they've effectively reconciled themselves to staying for a few years.

Now, in terms of determining responses to emails, stress and unrealistic demands, individuals do have a choice, but they can't control the consequences. That's where the issues rise. Let's take email responses. You have a choice to do the following:
a) Ignore the email/saying no without a justified reason - This angers your boss, since he or she is still waiting on your recognition of the emai/task-at-hand, and so this could lead to many things - negative attitudes, bad reviews, and unfavorable opinions provided to others.
b) Follow the instructions in the email - None of the above happens, your bosses like you, and continue to provide more work to you, and put you on tough jobs, making your life more painful.

So you likely go with b), and effectively give up control. There are many who would say exactly what you're saying: you always have a choice to leave. I will not disagree. The issue though, is that after we've made that choice, there's this illusion of choice we have that doesn't exist. And because of that,we suffer, knowing that there's ways to improve this but we don't have the power to do so. Sometimes, we know it can't be improved, so we vent as a way to release our stress, and then keep plodding along until we reach a point where we can't take it anymore or accept that this is the best path for us career-wise.

Now, there are several choices we can make, and strategies we can utilize, to survive successfully at any Firm. But it could only be utilized effectively to an extent. 

It's the same reason why the smartest people choose to be bankers at goldman sachs and hate their lives instead of choosing to be  teachers or working in non-profits and feel fulfilled. They made that choice. It's sad. But they do it for the same reason we work at these firms, it's  all about the benjamins unfortunately.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi notfordisplay,

You raised a good point. This topic is a "double-blade" knife. You have the choice to say "no" and that is very important, because if you do not, your boss will overload you with more and more work, as you just bow your head down and do the work properly and quickly, he/she will know that instead of giving it to your mates -who will likely complaint or even refuse- you will obey.
But, in this challenging environment, if you say "no" you are putting your position at risk, and you will be moved to the list of possible lay-offs.
It´s a tough life ain´t it? ;-)
And about the illusion of choice about leaving, do not forget that when you are thinking on leaving, you have already left, at least mentally...
Regards from Spain.

Anonymous said…
Deep reply for a deep post.

Popular posts from this blog

ADP/Payroll

Just realized that the very payroll/adp reports we all enjoyed looking at in order to see how much our client contacts made, now seem to piss me off. Especially when your main contact, who couldn't tell a debit from a credit, makes significantly more than you, and leaves at 5. It's almost guaranteed to get you in a foul mood and yak with your team about the ridiculous salaries that certain employees get when compared to yours.

should you choose to audit financial services?

I'm trying to decide whether to audit financial services companies or non-financial services companies. What would you say are the pros and cons of either industries? Do individuals who choose non-FS have less career mobility within the firm or if they decide not to stay with the B4 after a few years? Really depends on what you'd like to do after (unless you really love auditing). If you want to a controller,etc. at a p/e firm or a hedge fund down the road, you'd want to go into financial services. The pay won't be too bad, especially if you get a share of the insane bonuses they dole out. If you want to audit industries with tangible products and want to get a better understanding of the operations of such businesses, then other industries are the way to go.In terms of mobility outside the firm, auditing other industries is the way to go since you have plenty of options when you exit the audit world. For example, in 2008, after Lehman collapsed, it was incredibly hard

auditing vs consulting

I was wondering if you could break down the career opportunities in auditing and consulting (in a big 4). I know that consulting pays more in a big 4 and has more interesting work, but it seems that auditing has extremely good exit opportunities (Financial controller, CFO etc). Any thoughts on which is better in the long run? Well there's different consulting services offered by public accounting companies - the most popular being IT consulting and risk consulting. There are also other consulting services offered, but these two hire the most. Do they pay more? Yes, but not by much. Not enough for you to say: Shoot, the $$ is a huge reason for me to move over. Is the work more interesting than audit? Yes. You're actually looking over a company's processes and telling them what to do instead of what not to do (audit). Everyone I know who's made the switch likes it waay better than audit. In the long run though, choosing audit vs consulting really depends on what you want