Skip to main content

interviewing (part three)

Answers to some questions posted by a reader -

"a) Do you think that passing the exams (all 4 sections) would give an advantage for the entry-level job seeking? "

Absolutely, I'd be pretty impressed as an interviewer if you already had your CPA by then. That's pretty huge.

b) "What were the questions that you asked by candidates when you were interviewing them?"

Well, I did have a standard list of questions provided by the firm, a list of recommended questions I should say. That was a basic list of questions..example of your strengths and weaknesses, example of a time you worked in a team through a stressful project, etc...essentially the questions on leadership, teamwork, communication, etc. that pop up in a google search.
I'm not a fan of these questions because I remember making up canned answers and giving them out in every interview. So I primarily focused on getting a sense of their personality, intelligence, motivation and communication skills.

Comments

another71.com said…
Great blog!

If you would, please e-mail me...I have a question for you and didn't find your contact info on here

another71cpa@gmail.com

Someone recommended your blog for my blogroll.
Anonymous said…
I am so glad that question was asked about having passed the CPA exam before applying to the Big 4 firms. I am 29 years old with a bachelor's in accounting and I hope to have passed all 4 parts by October 2009 although I probably won't find out until the blackout period. I have my own bookkeeping business because I realized that working for other companies as an accounting clerk was making me extremely uncomfortable and slowing down my progress. Running my own business has exposed me to many different industries and I hope this will have an impact on being hired at a B4 firm.

Thank you so much for your blog. It's absolutely amazing.

Popular posts from this blog

ADP/Payroll

Just realized that the very payroll/adp reports we all enjoyed looking at in order to see how much our client contacts made, now seem to piss me off. Especially when your main contact, who couldn't tell a debit from a credit, makes significantly more than you, and leaves at 5. It's almost guaranteed to get you in a foul mood and yak with your team about the ridiculous salaries that certain employees get when compared to yours.

should you choose to audit financial services?

I'm trying to decide whether to audit financial services companies or non-financial services companies. What would you say are the pros and cons of either industries? Do individuals who choose non-FS have less career mobility within the firm or if they decide not to stay with the B4 after a few years? Really depends on what you'd like to do after (unless you really love auditing). If you want to a controller,etc. at a p/e firm or a hedge fund down the road, you'd want to go into financial services. The pay won't be too bad, especially if you get a share of the insane bonuses they dole out. If you want to audit industries with tangible products and want to get a better understanding of the operations of such businesses, then other industries are the way to go.In terms of mobility outside the firm, auditing other industries is the way to go since you have plenty of options when you exit the audit world. For example, in 2008, after Lehman collapsed, it was incredibly hard

Weekends Big 4 vs Private

Man there is such a big difference between being in Public vs Private when it comes to weekends. In public, you're always on call - and always have to keep checking your email. Okay, maybe you don't need to, but it's implicit that the best performers invariably end up with work on their mind - all it takes is one email from the client to piss you off or take up the rest of your day. In Private, I'm still checking my emails frequently during the weekend, a habit I wasn't able to get rid of. But it's so radio silent since almost everyone else in Private truly takes the weekend off. I almost feel guilty shooting an email, and that's a good sign.